TRANSGENDER RIGHTS ARE NATURE’S BLIGHT?

I like transpeople. There is a lot to learn from them. Only if you will pay more attention to their insights and suspend the fights. These people did their homework quite well and did a good job of marking it themselves—-although if I have been given the privilege to be an examiner, I wouldn’t have scored them any lower. 

Now, to the main issue, we’ve all been witnesses of their activism. And a lot of stupid people like me have ended up as unwilling but very fortunate victims of their very intelligent speeches. You see them display placards more often than they fly the American flag, not only warning us about the disadvantages of biological rigidity, but also drawing our attention to the looming danger of ecological collapse. We are asked to protect nature. They stress the need to preserve the health of the environment. They are so kind they are willing to sacrifice their own economic comforts for that, and wouldn’t such compassion for nature, for the planet, for the environment, inspire you? It sure does move me some times. 

But there’s an even more interesting twist that will leave you in awe of the ingenuity of these great minds. They say nature should only be preserved and protected when it comes to the environment, that we should only care about biology when it comes to ecology but should pay it no mind in terms of human anatomy. This is because years of spending more time on economic development and lesser time on hippie philosophy has skewed our perceptions and clouded our thinking in such a way that whenever we think our alterations to the environment have huge benefits, we are thinking in reverse, and whenever we think our recognition of human gender is relevant for the stability of our institutions, we are considering things upside down. 

So, we must preserve wildlife and reduce industrial activities so as not to interfere with the climate because these things affect the environment in very terrible ways, even though scientists are still trying to find out what effects they have and have refused to show us their very clear findings about the adverse effects of human technology. But when it comes to gender, one of the most immutable aspects of nature, properly specified by each person’s anatomy, it is permissible to change nature, not to preserve it, it is okay to say fuck biology, because this has no consequences for human development and the stability of human society. Whatever negative consequences we see in the creation of 77 genders in absolute disagreement with biology, it is because we are thinking in reverse. 

Whatever negative consequences we see in the preservation of the ecosystem at the expense of our technology, even though scientists have refused to tell us the particular bad effects of our activities on the climate and the environment, it is also because we’re thinking in reverse. We need to abandon the prisons of economic development and social stability and tune into the world of hippie philosophy and transgender reality. In one hand, we must carry placards calling for the preservation of the ecosystem, and in the other hand, we must preach that gender is an irrelevant part of our biology, so nature does not care about it. 

This is only a contradiction according to the logic of old eras, the logic of the world before civilization, the kind of logic that predated modernity. But according to the logic of the 2nd Enlightenment, the thinking of the 3rd millennium, this is what it means to respect nature, to be one with nature, to understand ecology, to comprehend biology.

So, when next you see a transperson on the podium, let them speak, even if they don’t think, because they are an academic comedian and they have the right to be.